Difference between revisions of "Talk:Map"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
For some reason, aligning it to the right puts a 1 pixel border round every cell, which shows up as breaks in the red line.<br> | For some reason, aligning it to the right puts a 1 pixel border round every cell, which shows up as breaks in the red line.<br> | ||
--[[User:Graham Phillips 110|Graham Phillips 110]] ([[User talk:Graham Phillips 110|talk]]) 10:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC) | --[[User:Graham Phillips 110|Graham Phillips 110]] ([[User talk:Graham Phillips 110|talk]]) 10:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | A "straight" diagram of the SVR is always confusing, I think, as it is really a "U" shaped route. Gives the impression the mainline connection goes to the left at Kidder. I suppose the diagram could be made the shape of a reverse "J" but that might not fit the page so well, or may be more complicated? Just a suggestion! [[User:Sharpo|Sharpo]] ([[User talk:Sharpo|talk]]) 11:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:01, 15 January 2015
The route of the Railway with links looks good & works very well. Sharpo (talk) 10:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
I gave up on the template idea, that's just a table with embedded images and links, which ends up looking and behaving the same.
At the moment, I can show the table with no borders, or I a can align it to the right, but not both at the same time.
For some reason, aligning it to the right puts a 1 pixel border round every cell, which shows up as breaks in the red line.
--Graham Phillips 110 (talk) 10:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
A "straight" diagram of the SVRSevern Valley Railway is always confusing, I think, as it is really a "U" shaped route. Gives the impression the mainline connection goes to the left at Kidder. I suppose the diagram could be made the shape of a reverse "J" but that might not fit the page so well, or may be more complicated? Just a suggestion! Sharpo (talk) 11:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
