Difference between revisions of "Talk:Steam Locomotives hired by the SVR"

From SVR Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Should we combine 2 pages or keep separate?)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Should we perhaps also include "hire-ins" for galas? [[User:Boldford|Boldford]] ([[User talk:Boldford|talk]]) 20:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 
Should we perhaps also include "hire-ins" for galas? [[User:Boldford|Boldford]] ([[User talk:Boldford|talk]]) 20:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 
:Currently we have another page for guest locos at galas, which includes a note if it was also a hire-in on this page.  This page was aimed more at the ones that were here for some weeks and worked normal services. Happy to combine the pages if felt better?
 
:Currently we have another page for guest locos at galas, which includes a note if it was also a hire-in on this page.  This page was aimed more at the ones that were here for some weeks and worked normal services. Happy to combine the pages if felt better?
 +
I hadn't noticed that. Probably best left as is with the cross-references. [[User:Boldford|Boldford]] ([[User talk:Boldford|talk]]) 21:09, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:09, 31 January 2015

Should locos be put on this list when they're on the resident fleet list too? I'm thinking of Hagley Hall here. --WillSalt (talk) 10:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

I was thinking of Kinlet Hall; the curse of the late night copy and paste strikes again!--Robin (talk) 12:44, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Should we perhaps also include "hire-ins" for galas? Boldford (talk) 20:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Currently we have another page for guest locos at galas, which includes a note if it was also a hire-in on this page. This page was aimed more at the ones that were here for some weeks and worked normal services. Happy to combine the pages if felt better?

I hadn't noticed that. Probably best left as is with the cross-references. Boldford (talk) 21:09, 31 January 2015 (UTC)