Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of rolling stock"
(→25771: new section) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Fair enough. [[User:Boldford|Boldford]] ([[User talk:Boldford|talk]]) 09:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC) | Fair enough. [[User:Boldford|Boldford]] ([[User talk:Boldford|talk]]) 09:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == 25771 == | ||
+ | |||
+ | A photo from Richard Herington on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=951746388210654&set=pcb.10152898366176989&type=1&theater shows this coach but i can't see it on the wiki, Coach details | ||
+ | http://www.cs.vintagecarriagestrust.org/se/CarriageInfo.asp?Ref=1784 |
Revision as of 19:33, 11 May 2015
Should the BRBritish Rail or British Railways Mark 1 carriages in George's Siding at Bridgnorth be included?
Mute point as the likelihood of them ever running again is pretty remote. Boldford (talk) 16:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
We've got grounded bodies and bodyless underframes in the wagon section, so yes, if it's recognisable as a carriage, it should be listed. --Graham Phillips 110 (talk) 08:32, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Fair enough. Boldford (talk) 09:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
25771
A photo from Richard Herington on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=951746388210654&set=pcb.10152898366176989&type=1&theater shows this coach but i can't see it on the wiki, Coach details http://www.cs.vintagecarriagestrust.org/se/CarriageInfo.asp?Ref=1784