Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dogs on the SVR"

From SVR Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Annual Family Pass page to be written)
m (Removed reference to annual family pass, page now added)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Discussion on Unofficial FB site on rules for dogs prompted this new page. The 'In addition' restrictions are taken from that discussion, double checking would be good. In addition it seems there is no restriction at the King & Castle, but the Valley Suite was not mentioned. Again, confirmation would be good. The KRM webpage is silent.  
 
Discussion on Unofficial FB site on rules for dogs prompted this new page. The 'In addition' restrictions are taken from that discussion, double checking would be good. In addition it seems there is no restriction at the King & Castle, but the Valley Suite was not mentioned. Again, confirmation would be good. The KRM webpage is silent.  
 
Is it me or is the 'single or return' dog fare language confusing?--[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 12:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 
Is it me or is the 'single or return' dog fare language confusing?--[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 12:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 
P.S. I've left the Annual Family Pass linked as a reminder to write that page!--[[User:Patrick Hearn|Patrick Hearn]] ([[User talk:Patrick Hearn|talk]]) 12:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 21:20, 21 March 2017

Discussion on Unofficial FB site on rules for dogs prompted this new page. The 'In addition' restrictions are taken from that discussion, double checking would be good. In addition it seems there is no restriction at the King & Castle, but the Valley Suite was not mentioned. Again, confirmation would be good. The KRM webpage is silent. Is it me or is the 'single or return' dog fare language confusing?--Patrick Hearn (talk) 12:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)