Difference between revisions of "Talk:Steam Locomotives"

From SVR Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Should we include 6634 (Waterman Trust) as a loco under restoration?.)
 
(Reordered list: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Should 6634 (Waterman Trust) be included as loco under restoration? (with suitable note on status etc).
 
Should 6634 (Waterman Trust) be included as loco under restoration? (with suitable note on status etc).
 +
 +
== Reordered list ==
 +
 +
I've reordered the out-of-use list to be in numerical order, as I couldn't really see much of a pattern in the old list. I've also pulled out some locos to put in a private/industrial list, mainly as it felt odd putting Warwickshire in the middle of the GWR locos - possibly part of the reason for the odd ordering.
 +
 +
I've also redirected a number of loco number/name pages, e.g. [[1450]] and [[The Flying Pig]], so that searching for those terms automatically redirects to the loco's page. I've not done this for most of the out-of-use locos, however. --[[User:Danny252|Danny252]] ([[User talk:Danny252|talk]]) 09:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:52, 16 February 2015

Should 6634 (Waterman Trust) be included as loco under restoration? (with suitable note on status etc).

Reordered list

I've reordered the out-of-use list to be in numerical order, as I couldn't really see much of a pattern in the old list. I've also pulled out some locos to put in a private/industrial list, mainly as it felt odd putting Warwickshire in the middle of the GWRGreat Western Railway locos - possibly part of the reason for the odd ordering.

I've also redirected a number of loco number/name pages, e.g. 1450 and The Flying Pig, so that searching for those terms automatically redirects to the loco's page. I've not done this for most of the out-of-use locos, however. --Danny252 (talk) 09:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)